Flash deal ends in--:--:--— use GEO10 for 10% off

Visibility & GEO AnalysisFree · runs in your browser

Claim-evidence strength scoring

EvidenceStrength Analyzer

Score the strength of the evidence backing any claim across 7 weighted factors. Why this matters →

Evidence strength
B

81

Quantification

100

7 numeric fact(s) incl. %/x

Sample size

90

Explicit sample size stated

Temporal anchor

85

Year/date present

Source citation

80

Explicit 'according to' / 'source'

First-party vs second-hand

92

First-party data (highest trust)

Claim ↔ evidence fit

28

20% keyword overlap

Evidence volume

90

54 words (30-120 ideal)

How it works

Enter the claim you're making and the evidence block that supports it. The analyzer scores seven factors: quantification, sample size, date, source citation, first-party vs second-hand, claim ↔ evidence fit and evidence volume. The aggregate is a 0-100 evidence strength score.

Why sample size is the most-missed factor

  • "4x more citations" with no sample size sounds like marketing. "4x more citations across 47 clients" sounds like data.
  • AI assistants treat sample size as a proxy for rigour - it lifts quantified claims from "anecdote" to "finding".
  • First-party data beats second-hand data by default because the assistant can't get it anywhere else, so it preferentially cites the primary source.

Rewrite weak evidence

For every factor under 55, add the missing piece. Combine with the Evidence Builder to wrap the result in a schema-ready block, and the Claim Support Analyzer to audit a full page.

Want this done for you?

Ship the full GEO playbook in 14 days

Geolify GEO packages bundle every tool on this site into a 14-day done-for-you build - llms.txt, schema, entity strength, content overhaul, citations and the measurement stack. From $499.

Explore More Packages

Combine services for maximum AI visibility.